- Services
- Case Studies
- Work By Industry
- Digital Trends
- Press
- About
- Contact
Positioning that survives a compliance review and still says something. In this category the constraint usually produces the sharper answer.
Names that survive Texas Medical Board scrutiny and don’t box you into a single service line as you grow. Austin practices scale fast; names that describe one procedure age badly.
Identity built to coexist with required regulatory marks — the FDIC official sign, NCUA signage, carrier and network marks — rather than fighting them for space.
Claims architecture built for what you’re actually allowed to say, whether that’s SEC marketing rules, FINRA communication standards or deposit insurance accuracy requirements.
Branch and office environments, signage systems, print, statements and disclosures, applied consistently across every regulated touchpoint.
The highest-stakes brand work in this sector. Consolidation is constant, and a botched post-merger rebrand costs deposits, policies and people.
"*" indicates required fields

Xceedance serves insurance clients with fast, fully automated technology, though its old site did little to signal that market leadership, to clients or prospective talent.
We delivered a conversion-optimized site with consistent branding, with a top-of-funnel campaign page, custom modules, Salesforce integration and an employer-branded careers page.
The site drew more than 200,000 new users in six months.
Clear Blue Insurance Group is a trusted provider of solutions for carriers and managing general agents.
Our experts led a full rebrand, with a clear strategy, refreshed logo, color system and brand book, then a custom site with unified messaging.
Authority and trust now come through at a glance, across every channel and partner.
We start with a discovery call, digging into your objectives, needs, desired position and value proposition as a financial institution.
We also review your messaging against Regulation Z advertising requirements and UDAAP standards at this stage, along with any marks your institution must carry, such as Member FDIC or Equal Housing Lender. Building the brand platform inside those constraints from day one means we won’t need to edit it back into shape later.
After the discovery call, we conduct extensive market research into trends, best practices and client behavior across the financial services space.
As a dedicated finance branding team, we analyze that research for gaps and opportunities, identifying where your institution can stand apart from competitors instead of blending in with them.
Next, our designers produce a comprehensive brand book and style guidelines, giving you a clear roadmap for the brand you’re building.
We document everything from tone of voice to visual application here, so you can maintain consistency across every touchpoint as your institution grows into new markets.
Finally, we map out a rollout plan across every regulated touchpoint, branch signage, account statements, required disclosures, cards and digital properties, so nothing launches out of sequence or out of compliance.
We sequence that plan against any compliance deadline already in play, whether that’s a merger, a charter conversion or a regulator-driven timeline, so your rebrand lands on schedule instead of racing a deadline at the end.

The amended Part 328 rule took effect on 2 March 2026 with compliance required by 1 April 2027.
It requires the FDIC official digital sign on your homepage, login pages and the first screen of deposit account opening, with constraints on color and typography, plus separate signage for pages about non-deposit products.
Practically, it’s a brand system change — a required mark that has to live alongside your identity on your most valuable screens. Handled well it reads as a credential; handled late it reads as clutter.
Probably not, but it becomes your decision rather than a rule. The NCUA proposed eliminating §740.5 in December 2025; the official sign requirement under §740.4 would remain.
For most credit unions, insured status is a trust asset worth keeping voluntarily — especially against banks whose customers assume insurance without thinking. What changes is that you can now place it deliberately, where it does work, instead of everywhere by default.
It depends on your registration. Investment advisers operate under the SEC marketing rule — testimonials and endorsements are permitted with disclosure of client status, compensation and conflicts, and gross performance can’t be presented without net. Broker-dealers work under FINRA’s standards.
Insured institutions can’t advertise deposit insurance misleadingly. We resolve this during strategy, because it determines which proof points the brand can be built on.
Earlier than most institutions think — ideally while the naming and architecture decision is still open, not after it’s been made in an integration meeting.
The choice between retaining both names, adopting one, creating a new one or endorsing and phasing has consequences for depositors, policyholders and staff retention, and it’s very expensive to revisit.
By being specific rather than borrowing the visual language of incumbents. Serif type and columns don’t create trust; concrete answers do — who holds the deposits, who insures them, who regulates you, who’s behind the company. The brands that solve this well look modern and say serious things, rather than looking old to seem serious.
Yes. Brand strategy and identity usually run first, since the site is one expression of the system rather than the system itself.
Our deepest financial work is in insurance, insurtech and member-owned institutions. The strategic problems — regulated claims, trust as a generic category promise, consolidation — carry across the sector, and we’re happy to talk about fit honestly rather than claim depth we haven’t earned.
"*" indicates required fields